The first is the high picture quality of the film? I was shooting the product still. To the car, small to jewelry. Occasionally shooting portraits.
5 thoughts on “Canon EF 135mm F/2L USM and Canon EF 100mm F/2.8L IS usm shooting still with a shot with a high quality?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
If you choose one in the second choice, then you must choose a hundred micro, this is not a matter of picture quality. Because the recent focus distance of 135F2 is 90cm, there is no small object at all, let alone jewelry.
A shot of shooting needs such a shot.
Jewelry jewelry watches, there is no doubt that it uses a lot;
135-2.0 is great to shoot people, and the jewelry will be taken very small to see the details; Objects have to use about 35 heads.
This kind of small items still have absolute advantages
135/2 is a dedicated fixed focus lens (of course, other genre can also be used), and 100/2.8 is a macro fixed -focus lens, which is more suitable for shooting static/jewelry than the former. You can shoot the details of the object at close range.
Buying Jianeng is a little bit, it is more suitable for shooting still. When I met jewelry, I went forward and met the car back. After taking a portrait, grind the skin.